FBI Seeks Court Permission for Private Review of Withheld Records in Tinubu-Related FOIA Case
FBI Seeks Court Permission for Private Review of Withheld Records in Tinubu-Related FOIA Case
OSOGBO, Osun State — August 21, 2026 — The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has asked a federal court in Washington, D.C., for permission to submit certain explanations privately to the judge as it seeks to withhold portions of records requested in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case involving records connected to Nigerian President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
According to a report by SaharaReporters, the FBI filed a four-page motion on August 20, 2026, in the case of Aaron Greenspan v. Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, et al., a long-running FOIA lawsuit before U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell.
The FBI is seeking permission to submit sworn declarations ex parte and in camera, meaning the documents would be reviewed privately by the judge and would not be made available to the public or the opposing party.
Records at the Centre of the Case
The dispute involves two FOIA requests, according to the reported court filing. One request seeks the FBI's complete file relating to Tinubu, while another seeks records of FBI interviews, commonly known as “302 reports,” allegedly conducted between 1992 and 1993 in connection with a bureau case referenced in the litigation.
The FBI has reportedly relied on several FOIA exemptions in withholding parts of the requested records. The bureau argues that public disclosure of certain information could reveal law-enforcement methods or potentially endanger an individual's life or physical safety.
For some of the exemptions it is relying upon, the FBI says it cannot fully explain its position in public and has therefore asked the court for permission to provide additional justification under seal.
If the request is granted, the FBI plans to submit two sealed declarations by August 28, 2026. The plaintiff, Aaron Greenspan, has opposed the FBI's request, according to the reported filing.
Long-Running FOIA Litigation
The case has been before the court for more than three years and relates, in part, to historical U.S. records concerning investigations and civil forfeiture proceedings from the early 1990s.
Publicly reported court records from that period have previously been the subject of significant public and political discussion. President Tinubu has consistently denied wrongdoing, while his legal representatives have maintained that the proceedings were civil, in rem forfeiture actions brought against property rather than criminal proceedings against him.
Tinubu was not arrested, criminally charged or convicted of a drug offence in the United States in connection with the matters referenced in those historical records.
Political Context
The latest FBI filing comes as Nigeria approaches the 2027 presidential election, with Tinubu widely expected to seek re-election.
SaharaReporters also reported that the FBI's motion was circulated publicly by a Washington-based lobbying firm reportedly retained by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar.
However, the FBI's latest motion does not itself accuse President Tinubu of committing any criminal offence. The filing concerns the bureau's request for permission to provide a private explanation to the court regarding its decision to withhold certain information under the FOIA.
The underlying case remains pending before Judge Howell.
This report is based on publicly reported court proceedings and original reporting by SaharaReporters. AccordWatch has presented the claims and historical issues referenced in the litigation with attribution and includes President Tinubu's long-standing denial of wrongdoing. The matters discussed in the current FBI filing do not constitute a new criminal allegation or criminal conviction against the President.







